Shark ION Robot vs Roomba: Full Comparison
With hundreds of robotic vacuum cleaners to choose from, how do you choose the best one? It can get very confusing, we know. So, to make things a lot simpler, let’s check out two of the most popular brands that manufacture robotic vacuums right now: Shark Ion Robot and iRobot Roomba. When searching for a robotic vacuum, we are sure that you have come across these two brands.
In this post, we will be discussing the comparison between Shark and iRobot offerings to help you decide which of these two is worth the purchase. Not only that, but we will also be going over the similarities and differences between the Shark ION 750, as well as the top iRobot vacuums, including Roomba 690, 890, and 980. We do hope that after you have read this post, you will now be confident enough to decide which one can give you great value for your money.
Shark ION 750 vs Roomba 980 Comparison chart
|Model||Shark Ion Robot 750||Roomba 980|
|Battery Type||Lithium Ion||Lithium Ion|
|Run Time||60 minutes||120 minutes|
|Navigation / Mapping||Shark Smart Sensor||iAdapt 2|
|Pick Up||Single brush bar||Brushless|
|Dimensions (inches)||12.6 x 12.6 x 2.6||13.9 x 13.9 x 3.6|
|Remote Control||Shark App||Home App|
|Brushroll||Single, bristle||Dual, rubber|
|Entire Level Cleaning|
|Full Bin Indication|
|Maintenance||$115/ year||$37/ year|
|Boundaries||Boundary Strips (9′)||Virtual Wall Barriers|
|Carpet Boost Technology|
The Roomba 980, on the other hand, comes with features that are already present in the previous models. In addition, it features the recharge and resume combination, as well as digital cleaning reports and memory mapping. These features alone make this powerful robotic vacuum very autonomous. Like the Shark ION 750, this vacuum automatically returns to its charger when the battery is low and once recharged, it will pick up where it left off, all thanks to the memory mapping technology.
You can also check the digital cleaning report if you want to know if your house has been cleaned or not. Running on Lithium-Ion batteries, this vacuum can operate up to 120 minutes before you need to recharge it.
Overall, the Roomba 980 proves to be the better option compared to the Shark ION 750 in terms of cleaning effectiveness. If you have the budget for it, then you should consider buying the Roomba 980.
When it comes to size, the Shark ION 750 has a smaller dimension and is more lightweight than the Roomba 890. For the filtration system, the Shark ION 750 uses the HEPA filtration while Roomba 890 uses AeroVac High-Efficiency filtration. For navigation, the Shark ION 750 comes with the Smart Sensor Navigation while the Roomba 890 comes with the iAdapt Navigation system.
Another point of comparison between these two outstanding vacuum models is that the Shark ION 750 is equipped with two side brushes when Roomba 890 has only one side brush. The recharge time for the Shark ION 750 was estimated to be an hour longer than that of the Roomba 890. In addition, The Roomba 890 has a full bin indicator, unlike the Shark ION 750. Lastly, the Shark vacuum comes with a full-width brush bar while the Roomba 890 comes with dual brushless extractors.
Overall, the Roomba 890 proves to be more effective in cleaning any type of floor. While the Shark ION 750 is way cheaper, you might want to give this one a second thought because reviews claimed that this vacuum tends to be challenging to operate on carpets.
The Shark ION 750 has the capability to return to its charger when the battery is already running out of juice. To add, you can also create a timetable for its cleaning schedule. Running on Lithium-Ion batteries, this vacuum can operate for up to 60 minutes before you need to recharge it. However, it is also noteworthy that it may still need supervision because it may get stuck on obstacles, unlike the Roomba 980.
Both the Shark ION 750 and the Roomba 690 have Wi-Fi capabilities, has a remote control via their respective mobile applications, as well as the same battery life of one hour. However, they do have differences. The Roomba 690 uses AeroVac filtration while Shark ION 750 uses HEPA filtration, which has proven to be a lot more effective in capturing small dirt and dust particles.
Another point of comparison between the two is the virtual wall feature of the Roomba 690. This technology produces the light, which is only visible to the unit. This boundary can block an area of up to 10 feet long, which also comes with an on and off switch. To add, you can turn on the Halo mode, especially if you want to block a 4-feet long diameter in your home.
While the similarities are very apparent between these two units, you should also consider both of their maintenance costs. The Roomba 690 has been proven to be a lot more economic than the Shark ION 750, even though they have the same price on the market.
Customer Feedback and Rating
You might be curious as to what actual buyers had to say and what they like about these four popular robotic vacuum cleaners. To give you an idea, here are some of them:
What Customers Like About Shark ION 750
- Its small size and lightweight quality
- Offered at a cheap price while providing good cleaning performance
- 1-hour battery life is enough to clean a major part of the house
- Has the capability to recharge
- Equipped with the HEPA filter, suitable for people who suffer from dust allergy
- Very easy to operate
- Comes with two side brushes that help get rid of dust, dirt, and hair
What Customers Don’t Like About Shark ION 750
- Might be challenging to operate the BotBoundary feature
- Might be costly to maintain than Roomba vacuums
What Customers Like About Roomba 890
- A lot more affordable than other Roomba 900 series
- Features Wi-Fi capability, making it easier to clean, turn off, and make a schedule
- Comes with high-performance drop and bump sensors
- Features a spot cleaning mode that ensures 100% work completion
- Equipped with easy to wash dual brushless extractors
- Its Home App is easy to use
What Customers Don’t Like About Roomba 890
- Might not be as economical as the Shark ION 750
- Might be challenging to operate on high pile carpet
What Customers Like About Roomba 980
- Can operate up to 120 minutes on a single full charge
- Features Wi-Fi capability, as well as mobile application control
- Works great with all types of floors
- Can easily be switched on or off on rugs
- Has the capability to run well on piles
What Customers Don’t Like About Roomba 980
- Expensive because of its features
- Might get in trouble operating on high pile carpets
What Customers Like About Roomba 690
- More economical to use compared to the Shark ION 750
- Offers Wi-Fi connectivity, allowing you to control the robotic vacuum through your smartphone
- Comes with voice command options
- Effective in picking up loose dirt, dust, and hair
What Customers Don’t Like About Roomba 690
- Uses the AeroVac filter, which may not be as effective as the HEPA filter
- Its bristle-style brush roll tends to tangle a lot
- Features no mapping technology
- Tends to get stuck on obstacles
- Might not be able to successfully come back to its home charging station
We do hope that this comparison and review on Shark ION 750, Roomba 890, Roomba 980, and Roomba 690, was able to shed some light for you to make an intelligent buying decision. We understand that it may not be easy, but if you would evaluate your options carefully, you would realize that there is a clear winner between these four popular robotic vacuum cleaners.
Our visitors also liked: Roomba 805 vs 880: Comparison Guide