Roomba 690 vs 960 – Comparison by Experts

Maintaining your floors in proper condition is a must, especially if you want to live in a healthy environment. In order to make that possible, you need to vacuum frequently. Lately, though, it seems that more people are turning to robotic vacuums, as they can do the job without requiring manual operation.

When purchasing a vacuum, you want one of high-quality that won’t die as soon as you plug it in. With iRobot vacuums, you have the fact that they are the leading robotic vacuum company, and there must be a reason for that. Their vacuums are known and loved by people. We will take a look at two popular models and compare them, respectively Roomba 690 vs 960.

Roomba 690

Roomba 690 has 4.1 stars rating on Amazon, and people were overall pleased with its performance.

This model comes with a 3-Stage Cleaning system, as well as dual Multi-Surface brushes that pick up everything, from small particles to larger amounts of dirt. Therefore, it’s effective in getting rid of whatever is staining your floor, thus leaving is clean.

Roomba 690 can be scheduled to start cleaning at certain times during the day. What’s even better is the fact that it is compatible with Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa, so you can simply use vocal commands when you’re busy in another room. In addition, the robot has an app that you can use to control the robot from anywhere, which makes it easier to schedule the vacuum when not at home.
The battery lasts for 90 minutes, after which the vacuum goes to recharge by itself when it notices the battery is too low. Wi-Fi connectivity was also implemented within this model.
Furthermore, this Roomba model has Dirt Detection, meaning the robot will work harder on areas with harder to remove dirt.

Roomba 960

With 4.2 stars rating on Amazon, this Roomba model is a very appreciated one by those owning it, and rightfully so.
Basically, it has a Premium 3-Stage Cleaning System that efficiently loosens and vacuums the pet hair and dirt on your flooring. It is also able to clean under beds, sofas and many other hard-to-reach areas, making it an amazing ally against dirt.

With its patented iAdapt 2.0 Navigation with vSLAM technology, the robotic vacuum cam properly maps its surroundings, increasing its effectiveness when cleaning.
Additionally, it contains High-Efficiency Filters, which make it a must-have for people struggling with allergies. It captures 99% of pollen, allergens, and dust as small as 10 microns. Sneezing and having a runny nose won’t be your worries anymore.

Our visitors also liked:  Roomba 650 vs 652: Comparison Review

Just like the 690, this model also has compatibility with Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant, which makes it possible to control the device with commands. Also, the home app is very useful as it works as a remote control, allowing you to control the vacuum cleaner from afar.

In addition, it goes to recharge by itself when the battery gets too low to properly perform.

Things to Consider while choosing Roomba 690 vs 960

Built-In Camera

What’s so astounding about the Roomba 960 is the fact that it has a built-in camera which utilizes VSLAM technology. In short, this technology was implemented to help the machine navigate more properly. Basically, it increases the mapping and navigation of the robotic vacuum, so the map is more precise and ensures better cleaning.

The camera is also useful when there are obstacles in the way of the vacuum. After all, you don’t want your new acquisition to clash with a hard object on the floor and potentially receive damage. The robot will notice and avoid the obstacles, so its safety is ensured.

Concurrently, the Roomba 690 wasn’t provided with this technology or a built-in camera whatsoever. That It works by relying on the acoustic and physical sensors using iAdapt technology.


If you purchase the Roomba 960, you will be met by brush-less extractors that are hardly getting tangled with the threads and long hair they find on the floor. That doesn’t mean you won’t get some wraps, because it happens with all vacuums, after all. Still, it makes maintenance much easier because you don’t have to struggle to untangle the hair and string from your brushes.

At the same time, its counterpart, the Roomba 690, was created with counter-rotating bristle extractors to loosen the debris and dirt, so they can be removed easily. They aren’t too different from the standard rotating bars used by upright vacuums, and they have just the same disadvantages. You will have to clean them off and offer maintenance quite regularly, or you risk having lots of tangled hair and threads on the extractors.

IHome App Control

You’re not always able to go wherever your robotic vacuum is situated, so you need something that allows you to control it, even from the distance. Even if you’re away from home, the app gives you full control of the vacuum, making it amazing for those going to trips frequently.

Luckily, both Roomba 690 and 960 have an app that gives you the possibility to schedule cleanings, force dock the vacuum, start it, utilize spot cleaning, and more. You can even give the robot a name.

Filtration System

Let’s face it, allergies are a pain to deal with, as the runny nose and constant sneezing are interfering with your activities and decreasing your performance. Filtration system is a very important thing to consider while comparing Roomba 690 vs 960, especially if you’ve got allergy.

Our visitors also liked:  Shark HV382 vs HV381

The 690 model uses AeroVac filters, which collects small particles in the filter, not allowing them to evade in your household’s air.

Conversely, the 960 uses HEPA filtration, which effectively traps 99% of the dust and allergens in your home. Especially if you own pets, this Roomba model will become your favorite house appliance. And you may ask what filtration system is better? Briefly – HEPA is newer technology and slightly more efficient than AeroVac.

Edge Cleaning Mode

Something found in 960 but the 690 is lacking is Edge Cleaning Mode. This feature lets you specify the edges that require more maintenance, this focusing on them when the time comes.

In other words, the robotic vacuum will run along the edges of the mapped area, while using the side brushes to push the debris and dirt away from the edges. The only disadvantage is that more battery will be required when focusing on these areas, but at least the edges won’t be missed.

Pros and Cons

You can’t jump in without knowing the advantages and drawbacks of a product.

With that being said, let’s start with Roomba 690. It’s very easy to use and has good value for money. Also, it can be used on multiple floor types. Even better, it’s not only compatible with Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant, but also has Wi-Fi Connectivity.

However, the bristle brushes might get the hair get stuck on them, and the vacuum cannot clean more rooms in one go either.

The Roomba 960, on the other hand, has more amazing features. It has HEPA filtration, stronger cleaning power, can recharge and resume its job, and clean multiple rooms in one go. Furthermore, it has a longer lasting battery, as well as a camera that allows for better mapping. Besides, it comes with the Edge Cleaning Mode as well.
On the bad side, it’s quite expensive and needs light to utilize the camera.

Roomba 690 vs 960 Comparison Table

Here’s a comparison chart to help you understand the differences between Roomba 690 vs 960 much better:

ModelRoomba 690Roomba 960
Built-In Camera
Vacuum TechnologyAeroVacAeroForce
Navigation TechnologyIAdaptIAdapt 2.0
Spot Cleaning
Remote ControlIHome AppIHome App
Carpet Boost
Full Bin Indicator
Voice Control
Edge Cleaning Mode
Virtual Wall Barriers22
Multiple Cleaning Passes
Entire Level Cleaning

Final Thoughts

It’s hard to come down to a decision, especially when dealing with a reputable company such as iRobot. Hopefully, this Roomba 690 vs 960 comparisons will help you purchase the robotic vacuum that fits your needs.

Related Posts

Dyson DC34 vs Dyson V6: Best Vacuums for Hair [Update 2019]

Bobsweep vs RoombaShark APEX DuoClean [AX950, AX951, AX952] – User Feedback